Match the description to the character (You may use your book.). 1. called Pickwick because he looked like a Dickens character the Beje 2. saleslady-bookkeeper for the ten Booms Toos 3. Corrie's sister Herman Sluring 4. the Jew Willem brought to the party Nollie 5. Corrie's nephew Herr Gutlieber

1. Called Pickwick because he looked like a Dickens character- Herman Sluring.

2. Saleslady-bookkeeper for the ten Booms- Toos.

3. Corrie's sister- Nollie.

4. The Jew Willem brought to the party- Herr Gutlieber.

5. Corrie's nephew, a musical prodigy-  Peter.

6. Home of the ten Booms- the Beje.

Explanation:

"The Hiding Place" by Corrie ten Boom tells the lives of the ten Booms during the Jewish prosecution by Hitler and the Germans. Including the events prior to and after the Holocaust, this text revolves around the theme of discrimination and mostly of the Christian faith.

1. Herman Sluring is the real name of Pickwick, who according to the ten Boom sisters, looked "incredibly like the illustrator's drawing in (their) copy" of a Charles Dickens' novel. He is extremely ugly but still a great friend of the ten Booms who helped them in the underground work helping the Jews. He also brought Corrie back to the Beje after she returned from the camp.

2. Toos is the woman who works in the watch shop as an accountant, saleslady/ book keeper for the ten Booms.

3. Nollie is Corrie's older sister who got married to Flip van Woerden. She is alwasy truthful in any circumstance and cheerful.

4. Herr Gutlieber, a Jewish man brought to the 100th party of the shop by Willem, Corrie's eldest brother.

5. Peter is the son of Willem ten Boom, a minister in the Dutch reformed Church. He is the favorite nephew of Corrie, and has extraordinary interest and ability in music.

6. The home of the ten Booms in the Dutch town of Haarlem is called "the Beje". It is in this home that the shop is also located.

yes, since there is a positive and a negetive if the positive and negitive wasn't there wouldn't a flow electricity in it.

as university of miami psychologists debra lieberman and adam smith pointed out in a recent article in the journal current directions in psychological science, humans have social and psychological mechanisms to deter incest. with very few exceptions, marriages between brothers and sisters and between parents and their children are verboten in every human culture. the primary psychological anti-incest mechanism is the yuck response. even the idea of sex with their mom or dad, bro or sis is upsetting to most people. the psychologist jonathan haidt has found that nearly everyone is repelled by the prospect of brother-sister sex, even in hypothetical situations in which there is no chance of pregnancy).

the biological cost of incest

this raises an interesting question: just what’s so bad about incest? sure, having sex with your dad or your sister seems gross — but why? some anthropologists have argued that incest taboos are learned social conventions. this explanation, however, doesn’t make sense to me as it does not explain the widespread existence of anti-incest mechanisms in creatures ranging from cockroaches to chimpanzees. second, the incest taboo is about as close to a universal law as human moral rules get.

why should mechanisms to avoid incest be so widespread both in nature and across human societies? the answer is simple. the problem with having sex close with relatives is that there is an astonishingly high chance that your offspring will be born with a serious birth defect.