Michael recounts to his sister a memory of a track meet that he won. As he describes the details, his sister says, "That was my track meet!" They talk to their mother who verifies that on that occasion it was Michael's sister who won the track meet. Which of the sins of memory would explain Michael's mistake?

The sins fo memory that would explain Michael's mistake is: missatribution.

Explanation:

Missatribution is one of the memory sins that has to do with a false atribution to the memory that a person is having. This means, a person appropiates himself of herself of a memory, when it acctually wasn't something happening to him or her.

answer; i believe two are ; /// world bank and international monetary fund; good luck

if interdependence implies a two-way dependence, and if each partner is equally dependent on the other for success, then there is an equal commitment to the making the partnership successful. the advantage is sustainability of the relationship, the disadvantage is that decisions are "democratic" and therefore may take longer to reach and more likely to be a compromise (which is not always the best solution). as the interdependence moves away from equality, the decisions become more influenced by the more independent partner. in the extreme the relationship becomes more dictatorial and more like "master-slave". generally the relationship has less commitment in both directions and is more likely to be temporary.

if one generalizes (and one shouldn't), equity partnerships, which is probably what is implied by interdependence, can be slow to progress or change but durable. the extreme alternative, independent-dependent partnerships tend to be efficient but more fragile.

hope this but you will have to site your own evidence. : )