Amidst discussions on budget cuts to rein in the U. S. fiscal deficit, some commentators were of the opinion that foreign aid spending should be reduced. Others felt that reducing foreign aid would adversely affect the recipient countries.

The answer is: That reducing foreign aid would adversely affect recipient countries.

Explanation:

If migration increases the job offer when it is most needed, it helps to accelerate the  speed at which the economy expands favoring the work of fiscal policy.

By increasing the labor supply, immigration generates that labor costs tend to remain relatively stable without generating pressure on prices, which can lead to  relax the tightening of monetary policy. About this possible result there is evidence.

For example, in the economic boom that was observed in the 1990s in the US, the  Productivity and workforce growth were key factors. Both kept unit labor costs at low levels and allowed the economy to grow faster with less inflation, perhaps reducing the need for the Federal Reserve (Fed) to intervene forcing upward interest rates.

The answer is: That reducing foreign aid would adversely affect recipient countries.

barack obama he actually listens

the anti federalists was a movement that was opposed to the creation of a us federal government. although they were not as organized as the federalists, they also had a large group of leaders, especially in state politics.

the statement "now, in a large extended country, it is impossible to have a representation, possessing the sentiments, and of integrity, to declare the minds of the people” represents the concerns of the anti federalists.

they strongly believed that the federalists were representing the interests of aristocratic elements of society at the expense of the majority of ordinary people, who lived in a rural society.

their fear for the creation of a strong federal government and the president’s power of veto in their opinion would create a tyrannical rule that would dominate the people. they defended the importance of restraining the government’s power towards people at any cost.