Peter is invited to a friend’s party but has a final exam the next morning. Part of him wants to stop studying, go to the party, and have fun. The other part of him wants to study to pass the final exam so that he can graduate college. The part of Peter who wants to have fun is the , and the part of Peter that wants to defer gratification to reach a goal is the .

For each of the following, mark whether it is a possible confounder (a factor that mixes up the results, making it look like candy is to blame when it's a causal (or causation) link which supports the argument that candy causes criminal behavior (ie, explains how candy leads to criminality ), or neither (an irrelevant factor, something that may cause people to become criminals but has nothing to do with eating candy). choose your answers based only< on the information given. additives in candy- additives found in candy may adversely affect brain development of young children in ways that could contribute towards adult aggression. impulsive personality-- kids who are highly impulsive and have trouble delaying gratification are more likely to eat candy every day as children and more likely to disobey laws as adults. violent abuse-- children who suffer violent abuse are more likely to become violent adults and commit violent crimes. gender- boys are overwhelmingly more likely to commit violent crimes

Is it true the ancient egyptians created a calendar that had 10 days in a week

What impact does geography have on where people live in brazil?