2 Points
In a democracy, it is essential that elections are:

Ms. h's family is in the waiting room of the intensive care unit. ms. h is very ill and the family has been told she will probably die during this hospital admission. you are walking by the waiting room and you see that they are all seated together, crying. what is your best response? this task contains the radio buttons and checkboxes for options. the shortcut keys to perform this task are a to h and alt+1 to alt+9. a go into the waiting room, sit next to them, and give them time to talk with you. b call the hospital chaplain to visit them and offer prayers. c find a social worker to go into the waiting room to see if they need anything. d leave them alone to give them private time to do their grieving.

During he 1840s, more americans than british settled in the oregon country. how do you think this settlement influenced negotiations with the british over the territory

Athief was passing by a house under construction when he noticed that the ladder being used by workers on the roof had copper braces supporting the rungs. after making sure that the workers on the roof could not see him, the thief used pliers that he had in his pocket to remove all of the copper braces that he could reach from the ground. a short time later, a worker climbed down the ladder and it collapsed. he fell to the ground and severely injured his back. the thief was apprehended a few hours later trying to sell the copper for scrap. a statute in the jurisdiction makes it a felony for "maliciously causing serious physical injury to another." the thief was charged with malicious injury under the statute and was also charged with larceny. after a jury trial in which the above facts were presented, he was convicted of both charges. if he appeals the conviction for the malicious injury charge on grounds of insufficient evidence, how should the court rule? a affirm the conviction, because the thief was engaged in criminal conduct at the time of the act that resulted in the injury. b affirm the conviction, because the jury could have found that the thief acted with malice. c reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief intended to injure anyone. d reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief bore any malice towards the workers on the roof.