Which of the following is NOT a way a defendant can avoid liability under the 1933 act?a. The statement or omission was not material. b. The plaintiff and the defendant conspired to save the company. c. The plaintiff knew about the misrepresentation at the time of purchasing the stock. d. The defendant exercised due diligence in preparing the registration and reasonably believed at the time that the statements were true and there were no omissions of material facts.

1. state-issued photo ids. provide them for free for those who can't afford them.

2. the system we have seems to be working nearly perfectly. seems like about 31 cases per billion votes cast

3. the national policy for hiring new employees which requires proof of eligibility to work. there are something like 20 types of identification which can be used for this.

an informal structure in a bureaucracy would be something like so-called "office politics". where there's a formal structure set up for the organization, but then an informal subculture as well that has a way of organizing the bureaucracy further. this can be positive because it sets up an added degree of organization, albeit informal, within the bureaucracy.