Social Studies, 24.02.2020 18:31 b2cutie456

The belief that one should do nothing that can hurt or in any way inconvenience others because it will create undesirable feelings is the fallacy of .

Answers: 1

Show answers

Another question on Social Studies

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 13:40

Choose the correct citation for the case which established the “minimum contacts” test for a court’s jurisdiction in a case. select one: a. brown v. board of education of topeka, 347 u.s. 483 (1954). b. international shoe co. v. washington, 326 u.s. 310 (1945) c. haynes v. gore, 531 u.s. 98 (2000). d. international shoe co. v. washington, 14 u.s. code 336. q

Answers: 1

Answer

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 16:10

Which best explains why the supreme court’s decision in plessy v. ferguson was unconstitutional? the supreme court’s ruling allowed states to deny equal protection to any person within its jurisdiction. since the 14th amendment did not make concessions for people born outside the us, the supreme court’s decision could not be applied. the supreme court’s decision gave individual states the freedom to make their own laws in relation to non-whites. since segregation laws did not provide equal protections or liberties to non-whites, the ruling was not consistent with the 14th amendment.

Answers: 3

Answer

Social Studies, 23.06.2019 08:10

In the context of c. h. cooley's theory of groups, identify each attribute as either belonging to a primary group or a secondary group.

Answers: 2

Answer

Social Studies, 23.06.2019 09:30

Donald was arrested for murdering an acquaintance. at the trial, donald takes the stand and testifies that he and the victim knew each other. he admits that they would drink and use drugs together. one night while partying, donald explains in his testimony, an argument got out of hand during a card game. donald explains that the victim accused him of cheating and pulled out a knife on him and started swinging it in the air. donald said that he had no choice but to pull out his gun and shoot the victim. the jury convicted donald of manslaughter. who would argue that donald weighed the potential costs and benefits of shooting the victim and decided to pull the trigger as a result of free will? a. a rational choice theorist b. a critical criminologist c. a conflict theorist d. a positivist

Answers: 3

Answer

You know the right answer?

The belief that one should do nothing that can hurt or in any way inconvenience others because it wi...

Questions