Lorde critiques the notion, "it is the responsibility of the oppressed to teach the oppressors" – What does this mean? Why do you think she takes this position?

By forcing the oppressed to teach the oppressor, time and interest is diverted away from the oppressed, allows oppressors to avoid taking responsibility for their actions, and exploiting oppressed class/taking their resources.

Teaching the oppressor does not change the existing power structure, it creates the idea of a monolith, and the dominant group decides what should be offensive to oppressed groups.

this statement is true.

forests are public goods, available for everybody. when usage of such a good becomes interesting for consumers and its usage increases, there can be a risk of overexploitation. it is a non rival good therefore, if one person consumes the good it does not reduce the availability for subsequent consumers.

these caracteristics require the establishment of measures in order to prevent the destruction of a commonly owned space, for example, to restrict the amount of people that have access to the same time.

american political culture includes a plenty of focus views and preferences. not all westerns experience the same opinions, of course, but the large preponderance promises to these general ideas, including equality, justice, freedom, individualism, integrity, and difference.

the united states is a democratic republic. residents elect representatives to governmental, nation, and local administration; those deputies create the regulations that command u.s. community. although emptiness in u.s. law needs it, in usage, the administrative system is ruled by executive factions.