subject
Social Studies, 24.02.2020 22:38 rscott400

When the US launched military attacks against Mexico, the scenario consisted of a. Zachary Taylor attacking California; Winfield Scott marching from Texas to Mexico City, and Stephen Kearney capturing the port of Vera Cruz and marching inland to join the forces of Scott at Mexico City. b. Zachary Taylor marching an army from Texas directly through northern Mexico to Mexico City with Stephen Kearney holding his northern flank, and Winfield Scott capturing Mexico's major port at Vera Cruz. c. Winfield Scott assaulting Vera Cruz by sea and quickly marching inland to capture the Mexican capital in Mexico City while Stephen Kearney and Zachary Taylor were holding Texas and New Mexico. d. Stephen Kearney attacking California; Zachary Taylor marching from Texas into northern Mexico, and Winfield Scott orchestrating a naval attack at Vera Cruz and marching to Mexico City.

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 01:10
Gettysburg address question what do you notice about the length of this address? why do you think lincoln made it so short?
Answers: 3
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 01:30
An artist entered into a written agreement to sell a patron a partially finished painting once it was complete. the patron later learned that the artist planned to sell the painting to a third party who offered to pay the artist more than the contract price. the patron filed suit to compel the artist to sell the painting to her in accord with the terms of their agreement, while the artist denied that the painting the artist planned to sell to the third party was the subject of the agreement with the patron. at trial, the patron did not introduce the written agreement or explain its absence. rather, the patron sought to testify that, when she signed the agreement, the artist had pointed to the painting in question and stated that it was the patron’s painting. the artist’s attorney objected to the testimony that the artist identified the painting as belonging to the patron. how should the court rule? asustain the objection, because the artist’s statement was hearsay. bsustain the objection, because the patron failed to produce the written agreement or explain its absence. coverrule the objection, because the statement is not hearsay. doverrule the objection, because the statement was relevant.
Answers: 3
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 17:00
Earlier studies were more slanted toward a. the upper class. c. caucasian males. b. teenagers in school. d. caucasian females. select the best answer from the choices provided a b c d
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 04:31
This is a crossword assignment for psychology 8 letter word a benefit of observational research is that it often generates
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
When the US launched military attacks against Mexico, the scenario consisted of a. Zachary Taylor at...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 21.01.2021 05:00
question
Mathematics, 21.01.2021 05:00
question
Mathematics, 21.01.2021 05:00
Questions on the website: 13722363