Barbour and Wright maintain that when the Supreme Court issues a ruling on the constitutionality of a particular bureaucratic regulation, they are

Because when Supreme Court rules on the legality of a specific bureaucratic regulation, according to Barbour and Wright, it does so "Piecemeal."

It's a patchwork approach with unsystematic, incomplete acts spread out over time.

A piecemeal judgement is a document produced by an external auditor that expresses a perspective limited to specific line components within a corporation's financial statements.

An auditor can provide a fragmented opinion in situations where entire information is not available.

In the patent litigation case, for example, the defendants used a piecemeal investigative method, analyzing just the records of a few business workers.

Learn more:

link

Barbour and Wright maintain that when the Supreme Court issues a ruling on the constitutionality of a particular bureaucratic regulation, they are "piecemeal".

Explanation:

It is a piecemeal approach accompanied by unsystematic, partial actions taken over periods. A piecemeal judgment is a document provided by an external auditor expressing a view confined to particular line elements within the financial statements of a corporation. In a situation where complete information is not accessible, an auditor can offer a piecemeal opinion.

For an instance, the defendants pursued a piecemeal investigation strategy in the patent infringement case, examining only the records of selected corporate employees. The district court stated that the method was contradictory to the Federal regulations of Civil Procedure and repeated court orders.