Plaintiff sued a National Football League team, alleging that she had been sexually assaulted by several team members in a hotel room after a game. Team offered the plaintiff a cash settlement in exchange for two promises: (1) plaintiff would never discuss publically the suit or the terms of the settlement; and (2) plaintiff would never again sue the team or the individual players on any claim connected with the incident. Agreeing not to exercise these legal rights constitutes .

FORBEARANCE

Explanation:

It seems as though there are options to this question but the most logical answer is,

FORBEARANCE

This is the act of refraining or abstaining from acting in a manner that one has a legal right to. The person is deciding not to pursue their right to the full extent of the law.

It is usually used in financial law to describe when a creditor gives more time to a debtor than agreed to pay back but can be used here because the Plaintiff by signing the settlement will no longer pursue the legal rights given to them.

    racial conflict and discrimination has existed ever since man learned to kill with rocks and bones. these conflicts arose from disputes between territory, power, wealth, religion, or simple difference. some of the most infamous racial disputes include slavery, the holocaust, and the civil rights movement.

    these listed disputes often resulted in casualties from all sides. riots, wars, imprisonment, and lynching are all commonly associated with racial conflict on severe levels.

      however, racism is an improving issue in recent decades. people are being more accepting and welcoming of diverse populations. though, the world isn't perfect and it will take much more time, if ever, until the world is rid of racism.

answer:

d. because dr. laguardia selected a widely used measure, his study generalizes to has strong external validity. external validity has limited external validity. other applications of this measure.

the widely used measure that he applied to his experiment was the benton facial recognition test. it employed on to football players and as result, only players who suffered brain concussions did not pas this test. and although it has an external validity, it is limited because it isn't general to apply to other population.