Which of the following is an accurate comparison of the two court cases?Baker v. Carr (1961) - Shaw v. Reno (1993)A. Ruled that Tennessee violated the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment - Ruled that North Carolina violated the due process clause of the Fourteenth AmendmentB. Led to the "one-person, one-vote" judicial doctrine - Prohibited oddly-shaped majority-minority districtsC. Decided that the Supreme Court can declare a law unconstitutional - Decided that federal courts can intervene and decide redistricting casesD. Extended the Fourteenth Amendment to apply to the states - Led to an increase in power for the national governmentComparison B

(B) Led to the "one-person, one-vote" judicial doctrine - Prohibited oddly-shaped majority-minority districts

Explanation:

Baker v. Carr (1961) is a Supreme Court case concerning equality in voting districts. Decided in 1962, the ruling established the standard of "one person, one vote" and opened the door for the Court to rule on districting cases.

Shaw v. Reno (1993) In 1991, a group of white voters in North Carolina challenged the state's new congressional district map, which had two “majority-minority” districts. The group claimed that the districts were racial gerrymanders that violated the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.  In its 1993 decision, the Supreme Court agreed, ruling that race cannot be the predominant factor in creating districts.

early settlements on the subcontinent. both the indus and the ganges rivers carried rich silt from the mountains to the plains. when the rivers flooded, the silt spread over the plains and made the soil in the river valleys fertile for farming.

i truly dont know the answer wait i do its 1,3,4