For years you have had a pet box turtle named Bob that roamed freely in your yard. And for years, Bob has gone into hibernation every October. Curious about the environmental cues that govern this behavior, you decide to keep Bob in the spare bedroom with the windows sealed agains light, the temperature kept constant, and the lights on all day every day. Bob gets plenty of food and seems happy enough. He moves around and grows during the summer, and the first year of your experiment, he goes into hibernation in October. But the second year, he's a bit off and starts hibernating in September. The third year he starts in August, and the fourth year he starts in July. From this information what is reasonable to conclude?

Bob has a circannual rhythm of 11 months.

Explanation:

Circannual rhythm is derived from the Latin words 'circa' meaning approximately and 'annual' meaning 'a period of one year.' So, Circannual rhythm can be defined as a biological rhythm in loving beings that occurs annually. This rhythm happens even in the absence of environmental cues. The rhythm was developed by Ted Pengelley and Ebo Gwinner.

In the given case, the circannual rhythm of Bob, a tortoise, is of 11 months as he hibernated in the first year in October, then in September, and then in August.

So, the correct answer is circannual rhythm of 11 months.

soothing tone) but quickly, the tone changes from a light tone to a grim one. by introducing disturbing word choices that are illogical.make a list of some of levertov’s images of war from both of her poems. how do her wordsaffect you? do you agree with her position on war? write a short response (at least 100 words) and support your answer with personal experience or your studiespoets can change the tone in a poem, and levertov does when the she refers to "delicate man . .whose eyes/are flowers that perceive the stars”. the word choices here are different. theimages began to show feelings of hope/potential. but this mood is interrupted with the dark oppressive words "entrails of still-alive babies" and "carcass-gulleys". levertov continues to switch tones by "the deep intelligence living at peace would have"—one is left with a sense of hope. i can connect with her words that humans can do better things than fight in war. we only have one life so dying in a war would be for no reason. also, i am a christian and in the bible, it says "thou shall not kill", and i strongly believe in that.people respond differently to satire—some like it, others don't get it. in at least 150 words, describe what you think of goines's narrative essay. discuss whether you think his position is convincing.the satire kept people's attention, rather than just rambling. instead of being dead serious, he adds humor to enlighten it. i think he did a good job of proving his point, but convincing people to stray from their own beliefs is hard, and satire can be offensive to that person. overall i think that goines's narrative essay was good because narrative essay create deeper understanding. i also like that the narrative essay is in first-person. the essay was filled with diction and word choice to let you know that the essay is going to be witty yet satirical. his point was to write  

explanation:

the answer is : the nut cases won't quit battling and their recurrence of flights will going to continue as before despite the fact that the battles are less hazardous now because of their bills have all of a sudden been blunted.   in the falcon dove diversion, two creatures will drive towards one another to crush one another, among the two one will win and other will swerve. in this way, clearly, the battle will be dependably there between two creatures for the assets or mate.