Social Studies, 07.03.2020 02:36 rhahgvnbhgfHhdj200

1. Do you think "multiple intelligences" is a valid construct? In other words, do multiple intelligences exist? (Be sure to include connections to the textbook/research when building your argument.)

2. Do you think that the test you took in Module 5 gave a valid picture of your intellectual abilities? In other words, do you think that test accurately measured what it is supposed to measure?

3. Provide at least one recommendation about how the developers of this multiple intelligences test could demonstrate evidence for the validity of the test. Your recommendation should focus on one of the types of validity described in the textbook [i. e., content-related validity, predictive validity, concurrent validity, or construct validity (using convergent or discriminant evidence)].

4. Finally, make a Biblical argument either for or against the existence of multiple intelligences. Whichever stance you take, be sure to back it up with meaningful and relevant scripture references.

Answers: 2

Show answers

Another question on Social Studies

Social Studies, 21.06.2019 19:00

Why are low-lying lands more suitable for agriculture than hilly areas?

Answers: 1

Answer

Social Studies, 23.06.2019 05:30

1. describe at least 3 similarities or differences between homo habilis and australopithecus 2. describe at least 3 similarities or differences between cro-magnon and neanderthals.

Answers: 2

Answer

Social Studies, 23.06.2019 05:30

An employee of the state government always received his state paycheck on the last workday of the month. the employee was not a good money manager, and just barely managed to make it from paycheck to paycheck each month. on the second to the last workday of the month, the employee had $45 in his checking account, and, needing to buy a birthday gift for his sister, he wrote a check to a gift boutique for $100. he knew that he would be receiving his paycheck the next day, so he could deposit the paycheck before the check would be sent to the bank.however, unbeknownst to the employee, the state legislature was having a budget impasse. because the state constitution prohibited any deficit spending, state employees were not paid as usual. without a paycheck to deposit, the check written to the gift boutique was returned for insufficient funds. the merchant complained to the police, who arrested the employee and charged him under a statute that prohibited "issuing a check knowing that it is drawn against insufficient funds, with intent to defraud the payee of the check."what should be the outcome of the employee's prosecution? a not guilty, because the employee intended to deposit his paycheck the next day.b not guilty, because it was reasonable for the employee to expect that he would receive his paycheck as usual.c guilty, because the employee knew when he wrote the check that he did not have sufficient funds in his account to honor it.d guilty, because reliance on a future source of income does not vitiate the employee's violation of the statute when he wrote the check.

Answers: 2

Answer

Social Studies, 23.06.2019 06:30

Which of the following actions do the national response and recovery policies (national response framework, national infrastructure protection plan, national incident management system) not provide guidance on?

Answers: 3

Answer

You know the right answer?

1. Do you think "multiple intelligences" is a valid construct? In other words, do multiple intellige...

Questions