subject
Social Studies, 09.03.2020 17:49 loveket143

"The Crimea!* Once a flourishing and wealthy colony of ancient Greeks, a trade hub for Venetians and Genoese, a center of sciences and the arts! In time, however, it fell to the Mongols, became a haven for robbers, and, under the crescent flag of Islam, began to be a place where Christians were persecuted. Despite being rich in natural resources and blessed by a favorable geographical location and a mild climate, the peninsula grew poor, lost its significance, and became a threatening neighbor to the Christian kingdoms of the Caucasus, to Poland, and especially to Russia. But one hundred years ago, in its forward march to the south, to its natural borders, reclaiming the right to its ancient lands, our empire took possession of the Crimea and restored it to its ancient state of enlightenment and peace. In the past one hundred years, many cities in the European style were built, ports were opened, good roads were constructed and, most importantly, numerous educational institutions were established that spread the light of knowledge and science among the Muslim Crimean Tatars who, until now, had dwelled in ignorance. In Crimea arrived the happiest of days!" *A peninsula on the northern shore of the Black Sea; the Crimea was ruled by a native Muslim dynasty subordinate to the Ottoman Empire until 1783, when it was annexed by Russia. A. Ivanov, Russian writer, A Century Since the Integration of the Crimea into Russia, book published in Russia in 1883The second paragraph best provides information about the way in which states in the nineteenth century .

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 00:00
Which best describes why it is necessary to evaluate a solution?
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 00:50
Cooper's contribution to the american novel was savestylesformat instructions
Answers: 3
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 07:50
Aplaintiff filed a civil action based on negligence against a defendant in federal district court, alleging that the defendant negligently ran a red light at an intersection and collided with the plaintiff's vehicle, causing the plaintiff's injuries. a week after the close of discovery, the plaintiff filed a motion for summary judgment on the issue of whether the defendant was negligent. with the motion, the plaintiff filed (i) his own sworn affidavit, which stated that the traffic signal was green as he entered the intersection, (ii) an affidavit of a witness who was driving the car behind him, which stated that the witness saw the entire incident and that the plaintiff's traffic signal was green as he approached and entered the intersection; and (iii) an affidavit of another witness, which stated that she saw the entire incident and that the defendant's signal had been red for several seconds before the defendant entered the intersection and was still red when the defendant entered the intersection. the defendant filed a response to the motion, noting that her answer denied negligence and further denied that her traffic signal was red, and argued that the issue of negligence and the issue of whether her traffic signal was red were in dispute, so those issues should be tried to a jury. how should the court rule on the plaintiff's motion?
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 16:00
Which choice best describes how your answer compares to the sample
Answers: 3
You know the right answer?
"The Crimea!* Once a flourishing and wealthy colony of ancient Greeks, a trade hub for Venetians and...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 21.07.2021 09:30
question
Geography, 21.07.2021 09:30
question
Mathematics, 21.07.2021 09:50
question
Mathematics, 21.07.2021 09:50
question
Mathematics, 21.07.2021 09:50
Questions on the website: 13722362