The extent to which less powerful members of institutions and organizations within a culture expect and accept an unequal distribution of power is referred to as .

Power distance

Explanation:

Power distance is a way in which a person shows their relationships with other people. This is the power that is distributed in less powerful, that think they have not distributed equally. For instance to put the people in a culture and accept that they are highly unequally distributed power as compared to the other culture. The high power distance relationship can be seen between the boss and his subordinates. But in low power distance, the relations between boss and the subordinates have interdependence.  

So that the power distance is the extent to which less powerful members of the organizations and institutions within the culture expect and accept not equal distribution in the power.

no , per capita income is not a true measure of the development because: -it only tells us about average income not how income is distributed among the people.it only give us an idea of the economic aspect.it is only at the qualitative basis.moreover, income is not only the way of development other factors are also as much as important as income.

the anti federalists was a movement that was opposed to the creation of a us federal government. although they were not as organized as the federalists, they also had a large group of leaders, especially in state politics.

the statement "now, in a large extended country, it is impossible to have a representation, possessing the sentiments, and of integrity, to declare the minds of the people” represents the concerns of the anti federalists.

they strongly believed that the federalists were representing the interests of aristocratic elements of society at the expense of the majority of ordinary people, who lived in a rural society.

their fear for the creation of a strong federal government and the president’s power of veto in their opinion would create a tyrannical rule that would dominate the people. they defended the importance of restraining the government’s power towards people at any cost.