As Warren looks back over his long life, he feels a sense of unity in his life's accomplishments. He would be described as being in Erikson's stage of psychosocial development.

Ego-integrity vs. despair

Explanation:

As Warren looks back over his long life, he feels a sense of unity in his life's accomplishments. He would be described as being in Erikson's ego-integrity vs. despair stage of psychosocial development.

Ego-integrity vs. despair stage involves reflecting on one's life and either moving into feeling satisfied and happy with one's life or feeling a deep sense of regret. For example,as Warren looks back over his long life, he feels a sense of unity in his life's accomplishments.

ego-integrity vs. despair.

Explanation:

Erikson's psychosocial development involves eight stages. The eight stages are listed below:

(1). Infancy(Under 2 years): this stage of psychosocial development is known as the Trust vs. Mistrust stage.

(2). Toddlerhood(2–4 years): this stage of psychosocial development is known as the Autonomy vs. Shame/Doubt stage.

(3). Early childhood(5–8 years): this stage of psychosocial development is known as the Initiative vs. Guilt stage.

(4). Middle Childhood(9–12 years): this stage of psychosocial development is known as the Industry vs. Inferiority stage.

(5). Adolescence(13–19 years) : this stage of psychosocial development is known as the Identity vs. Role Confusion stage.

(6). Early adulthood(20–39 years) : this stage of psychosocial development is known as the Intimacy vs. Isolation stage.

(7). Middle Adulthood(40–59 years): this stage of psychosocial development is known as the Generativity vs. Stagnation stage.

(8). Late Adulthood(60 and above): this stage of psychosocial development is known as the Ego Integrity vs. Despair stage.

The last stage of the Erikson's psychosocial development is what we are dealing with in this question. It is the stage in which one reflect on his or her life just like Warren.

soothing tone) but quickly, the tone changes from a light tone to a grim one. by introducing disturbing word choices that are illogical.make a list of some of levertov’s images of war from both of her poems. how do her wordsaffect you? do you agree with her position on war? write a short response (at least 100 words) and support your answer with personal experience or your studiespoets can change the tone in a poem, and levertov does when the she refers to "delicate man . .whose eyes/are flowers that perceive the stars”. the word choices here are different. theimages began to show feelings of hope/potential. but this mood is interrupted with the dark oppressive words "entrails of still-alive babies" and "carcass-gulleys". levertov continues to switch tones by "the deep intelligence living at peace would have"—one is left with a sense of hope. i can connect with her words that humans can do better things than fight in war. we only have one life so dying in a war would be for no reason. also, i am a christian and in the bible, it says "thou shall not kill", and i strongly believe in that.people respond differently to satire—some like it, others don't get it. in at least 150 words, describe what you think of goines's narrative essay. discuss whether you think his position is convincing.the satire kept people's attention, rather than just rambling. instead of being dead serious, he adds humor to enlighten it. i think he did a good job of proving his point, but convincing people to stray from their own beliefs is hard, and satire can be offensive to that person. overall i think that goines's narrative essay was good because narrative essay create deeper understanding. i also like that the narrative essay is in first-person. the essay was filled with diction and word choice to let you know that the essay is going to be witty yet satirical. his point was to write  

explanation:

answer; majority;