You attend a lecture in which a politician lists the 20 points of his/her platform in a relatively short period of time. After leaving the lecture, you are least likely to recall the points from the:.

Middle of the list.

Explanation: Recalling listed items or information from memory is usually attributed with a memory retrieval effect called the primacy and recency effect. When an individual remembers items at the beginning of the list probably due to the fact that it might have been rehearsed better than those at the end of the list, this is Called PRIMACY EFFECT. However, one might be able to recall items at the end of the list better than those at the beginning probably because they still exist in the short-term memory, thus is Called RECENCY EFFECT.

Therefore an individual may be able to remember either the items at the beginning or end of a list better. However, items at the middle seems to be the least likely to be remembered.

becoming the top african american female attorny and motivational speaker in opelika al 36801

explanation:

soothing tone) but quickly, the tone changes from a light tone to a grim one. by introducing disturbing word choices that are illogical.make a list of some of levertov’s images of war from both of her poems. how do her wordsaffect you? do you agree with her position on war? write a short response (at least 100 words) and support your answer with personal experience or your studiespoets can change the tone in a poem, and levertov does when the she refers to "delicate man . .whose eyes/are flowers that perceive the stars”. the word choices here are different. theimages began to show feelings of hope/potential. but this mood is interrupted with the dark oppressive words "entrails of still-alive babies" and "carcass-gulleys". levertov continues to switch tones by "the deep intelligence living at peace would have"—one is left with a sense of hope. i can connect with her words that humans can do better things than fight in war. we only have one life so dying in a war would be for no reason. also, i am a christian and in the bible, it says "thou shall not kill", and i strongly believe in that.people respond differently to satire—some like it, others don't get it. in at least 150 words, describe what you think of goines's narrative essay. discuss whether you think his position is convincing.the satire kept people's attention, rather than just rambling. instead of being dead serious, he adds humor to enlighten it. i think he did a good job of proving his point, but convincing people to stray from their own beliefs is hard, and satire can be offensive to that person. overall i think that goines's narrative essay was good because narrative essay create deeper understanding. i also like that the narrative essay is in first-person. the essay was filled with diction and word choice to let you know that the essay is going to be witty yet satirical. his point was to write  

explanation: