In the case Gitlow v. New York, Gitlow argued: a) that his First Amendment rights were being violated. b) that he couldn't be convicted of the same crime twice. c) that his Sixth Amendment rights guaranteed him the right to a jury. d) that he couldn't be jailed without being charged with a crime.

that his First Amendment rights were being violated

Explanation:

Gitlow v. New York was a case that was ruled by the Supreme Court of the United States on June 8, 1925 and stated that the First Amendment of the United States Constitution "Protection of Free Speech" also applied to state governments also. According to Gitlow, his article did not precipitate any violent action, but he was yet convicted, which he felt was a violation of his rights to freedom of speech as stated in the First Amendment.

A

Explanation:

In the case Gitlow v. New York, Gitlow argued: that his First Amendment rights were being violated

Benjamin Gitlow was arrested for distributing a communist pamphlet. He was charged under a New York law that banned the promotion of a revolution. He argued that his First Amendment rights were violated. Right to free speech he argued

The ruling established the practice of selective incorporation. The amendments can be incorporated as needed

could you go a bit more in depth with you question? it's quite hard to understand. as soon as you do that i will be glad to : )

answer; majority;