WHAT IF THE FACTS WERE DIFFERENT? Assume that the Lozas run a business manufacturing golf balls. The Bolivian ambassador to the United States signed a contract with the Lozas in the United States to purchase several thousand golf balls with the Bolivian flag on them. Those golf balls will be resold to the citizens of Bolivia for a discounted price. Bolivia then refused to pay for the balls. 1. In this situation, Bolivia waive its immunity. 2. In this situation, Bolivia commit a tort in the United States. 3. In this situation, there is to indicate that Bolivia violated an international law. 4. In this situation Bolivia entered into the agreement in , and the failure to pay has commercial effect on the United States because the customized golf balls are not likely to be sold in the United States, costing the Lozas significant loss. 5. In this situation, the Lozas sue Bolivia in a U. S. court.