Which law prohibits a former employee who served in certain positions on a contract in excess of $10 million from receiving compensation as an employee or consultant from that contractor for one year?

A) Federal Sentencing Guidelines for Organizations
B) Procurement Integrity Act
C) Sarbanes-Oxley Act
D) Federal Contract Protection Act

B) Procurement Integrity Act.

Explanation:

Government staff participating in the procurement and acquisition process have a significant role to play in protecting the quality of federal contracts and maintaining fair representation of bidders and contractors. The Procurement Integrity Act forbids the disclosure of information on supplier collection and contractor contracts or proposals. In fact, a former employee who has served in other capacities on a project or contract worth more than $10 million is barred from accepting benefits as an employee or supplier from the provider for a duration worth one year.

the answer is the petition of right.

explanation:

offer to of right, real demand of attesting a benefit against the english crown, the most remarkable point of reference being the petition of right of 1628, which parliament sent to charles i fussing of a movement of oversteps of law. the term also implied the framework (invalidated in 1947) by which a subject could sue the crown.   taking a gander at the frameworks used by maria amidu to make a standard in 2015 commending the 1628 petition of right, which was sent to charles i by the english parliament. at uniquely based law the crown, or the sovereign in his official cutoff, couldn't be sued in the ruler's courts. since the ruler was, really, the superior ace of those courts, coordinating value in them between his subjects, he was not subject to their ward. therefore it transformed into a preparation, at whatever point a subject's certified or individual property had come into the responsibility for ruler or his specialists without legitimate perfect, for the subject to engage the master in chamber for its recovery.