1. How do you think a white man in Tennessee in 1835 would regard Andrew Jackson? What do you think a Choctaw or a Cherokee person at the same time would say about him? 2. Do you think Andrew Jackson was a war criminal? 3. Do you think the US government intentionally misled the Indians? Why? 4. What would American life be like now if the US government had different policies toward native peoples? 5. How could the US government get away with breaking its treaties with native peoples? 6. How did the railroad impact Native Americans? 7. How did native people react to what was happening to them? In what ways did they resist?

ideology

explanation:

the answer is the petition of right.

explanation:

offer to of right, real demand of attesting a benefit against the english crown, the most remarkable point of reference being the petition of right of 1628, which parliament sent to charles i fussing of a movement of oversteps of law. the term also implied the framework (invalidated in 1947) by which a subject could sue the crown.   taking a gander at the frameworks used by maria amidu to make a standard in 2015 commending the 1628 petition of right, which was sent to charles i by the english parliament. at uniquely based law the crown, or the sovereign in his official cutoff, couldn't be sued in the ruler's courts. since the ruler was, really, the superior ace of those courts, coordinating value in them between his subjects, he was not subject to their ward. therefore it transformed into a preparation, at whatever point a subject's certified or individual property had come into the responsibility for ruler or his specialists without legitimate perfect, for the subject to engage the master in chamber for its recovery.

answer; can each be concretely realized in different ways;

answer; automatic fire suppression system;