"Steven and Andrea are married and live in San Diego, California. Shortly after the marriage, they purchase a home together. Two years later, Andrea inherits ranchland from her deceased father. In terms of ownership:"

a. the home is considered to be community property, but the ranchland is not.
b. the ranchland is considered to be community property, but the home is not.
c. both the home and ranchland are held as community property.
d. neither the home nor the ranchland are held as community property because California is not a community-property state.

A. the home is considered to be community property, but the ranch land is not.

Explanation:

Steven and Andrea are married and live in San Diego, California. Shortly after the marriage, they purchase a home together. Two years later, Andrea inherits ranch land from her deceased father. In terms of ownership: the home is considered to be community property, but the ranch land is not because the ranch land was inherited, which is considered under absolute ownership.

Ownership is the legal right to the possession of a thing or the state or fact of exclusive rights and control over property, which may be an object, land or real estate, or intellectual property. While,Communal ownership is a  situations where rights to use resources are held by a community in order words, the ownership of a property by a community so that each member has a right to use the property or a portion of it.

Absolute ownership is a free transferable and inheritable property a person can have as his actual right.

as university of miami psychologists debra lieberman and adam smith pointed out in a recent article in the journal current directions in psychological science, humans have social and psychological mechanisms to deter incest. with very few exceptions, marriages between brothers and sisters and between parents and their children are verboten in every human culture. the primary psychological anti-incest mechanism is the yuck response. even the idea of sex with their mom or dad, bro or sis is upsetting to most people. the psychologist jonathan haidt has found that nearly everyone is repelled by the prospect of brother-sister sex, even in hypothetical situations in which there is no chance of pregnancy).

the biological cost of incest

this raises an interesting question: just what’s so bad about incest? sure, having sex with your dad or your sister seems gross — but why? some anthropologists have argued that incest taboos are learned social conventions. this explanation, however, doesn’t make sense to me as it does not explain the widespread existence of anti-incest mechanisms in creatures ranging from cockroaches to chimpanzees. second, the incest taboo is about as close to a universal law as human moral rules get.

why should mechanisms to avoid incest be so widespread both in nature and across human societies? the answer is simple. the problem with having sex close with relatives is that there is an astonishingly high chance that your offspring will be born with a serious birth defect.

to plan an idea out before