The replacement of Sandra Day O'Connor with Samuel Alito was significant because a. Alito is far more conservative than O'Connor. b. Alito is far more moderate than O'Connor. c. Alito is much more inclined to support 1st Amendment rights than O'Connor. d. Alito is much stronger on states rights than O'Connor.

a. Alito is far more conservative than O'Connor

Explanation:

The change is significant because O'Connor was a moderate Republican, while Alito is considered by many one of the most conservative justices on the Court. Therefore, it is fair to state that Alito is far more conservative than O'Connor.

The answer is alternative a.

The correct answer is a). Alito is far more conservative than O'Connor

Explanation: Sandra Day O'Connor was the first female justice of thw supreme court in 1981. Upom her retirement, she was replaces woth Samuel Alito.

The replacement was significant because O'Connor was seen as a moderate conservative having a pragmatic approach. However, her replacement Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr., who was more conservative.

the united states constitution is the supreme law of the united states. the constitution, originally comprising seven articles, delineates the national frame of government. its first three articles embody the doctrine of the separation of powers, whereby the federal government is divided into three branches: the legislative, consisting of the bicameral congress; the executive, consisting of the president; and the judicial, consisting of the supreme court and other federal courts. articles four, five and six embody concepts of federalism, describing the rights and responsibilities of state governments, the states in relationship to the federal government, and the shared process of constitutional amendment. article seven establishes the procedure subsequently used by the thirteen states to ratify it. it is regarded as the oldest written and codified national constitution in force.