subject
Social Studies, 24.03.2020 20:19 miamassimino

Jill was planning on traveling over spring break, but she didn't want to spend a lot of money on the airfare. Even though it took more time, she went online to get tickets instead of going to a travel agent. What theory of motivation best explains Jill's behavior?

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 21.06.2019 14:30
Put the steps below into their correct order to show how to survey an essay
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 18:30
Recently, there has been pressure to loosen clean air standards. use economic arguments to support or oppose this proposed action.
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 04:31
During he 1840s, more americans than british settled in the oregon country. how do you think this settlement influenced negotiations with the british over the territory
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 05:30
Athief was passing by a house under construction when he noticed that the ladder being used by workers on the roof had copper braces supporting the rungs. after making sure that the workers on the roof could not see him, the thief used pliers that he had in his pocket to remove all of the copper braces that he could reach from the ground. a short time later, a worker climbed down the ladder and it collapsed. he fell to the ground and severely injured his back. the thief was apprehended a few hours later trying to sell the copper for scrap. a statute in the jurisdiction makes it a felony for "maliciously causing serious physical injury to another." the thief was charged with malicious injury under the statute and was also charged with larceny. after a jury trial in which the above facts were presented, he was convicted of both charges. if he appeals the conviction for the malicious injury charge on grounds of insufficient evidence, how should the court rule? a affirm the conviction, because the thief was engaged in criminal conduct at the time of the act that resulted in the injury. b affirm the conviction, because the jury could have found that the thief acted with malice. c reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief intended to injure anyone. d reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief bore any malice towards the workers on the roof.
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
Jill was planning on traveling over spring break, but she didn't want to spend a lot of money on the...
Questions
question
Social Studies, 26.07.2019 22:30
Questions on the website: 13722362