A newspaper editorialist argues that the use of DSM-5 diagnostic labels is destructively antidemocratic, because it enables an elite corps of mental health professionals to subtly control the values and life-styles of the rest of society. Explain what you might say to the editorialist about why psychologists use the medical model and the diagnostic labels in the DSM-5.

Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) to diagnose and classify mental disorders, tends shows concise and intended criteria, provided by experienced mental health professionals.

Explanation:

Although a newspaper editorialist argues that the use of the DSM-V diagnostic  labels is destructively anti democratic, because it enables an elite corps of  mental health professionals to subtly control the values and life-styles of the  rest of society, the use of these diagnostic labels eases an objective assessment through wide clinical settings that could describe  almost any behavior as a symptom of one or more disorders comprehensively.

The universal classification system, although someone with a psychiatric disorder may not fit the exact  criteria and may be misdiagnosed, the physician should make an  appropriate assessment of their symptoms/conditions and suggest appropriate treatment methods.

i feel as if they would both catch on before to long because they would see them to frequent

the answer is the petition of right.

explanation:

offer to of right, real demand of attesting a benefit against the english crown, the most remarkable point of reference being the petition of right of 1628, which parliament sent to charles i fussing of a movement of oversteps of law. the term also implied the framework (invalidated in 1947) by which a subject could sue the crown.   taking a gander at the frameworks used by maria amidu to make a standard in 2015 commending the 1628 petition of right, which was sent to charles i by the english parliament. at uniquely based law the crown, or the sovereign in his official cutoff, couldn't be sued in the ruler's courts. since the ruler was, really, the superior ace of those courts, coordinating value in them between his subjects, he was not subject to their ward. therefore it transformed into a preparation, at whatever point a subject's certified or individual property had come into the responsibility for ruler or his specialists without legitimate perfect, for the subject to engage the master in chamber for its recovery.