Social Studies, 25.03.2020 20:48 tmantooth7018

From The Salt Lake Tribune, September 13, 2001: "Washington's NATO allies declared Wednesday that the terrorist attacks in New York and Washington, D. C., can be considered an attack on the whole alliance if they were directed from abroad. 'An attack on one is an attack on all,' NATO Secretary-General Lord Robertson said after the alliance's ambassadors decided to invoke Article 5 of the NATO charter for the first time in the alliance's history." (Base your answers strictly on formal logic.)

a. Trace the formal logic of the text.
b. In your opinion, is an attack on the US an attack against all NATO allies?
c. In light of Robertson's claim that "an attack against one is an attack against all," what is the logical inference of the statement that, "the alliance's ambassadors decided to invoke Article 5 of the NATO charter for the first time in the alliance's history"?

Answers: 1

Show answers

Another question on Social Studies

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 14:10

How long is a representative’s term of office

Answers: 1

Answer

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 18:00

Acommittee that exists permanently in either the house of representatives or the senate is called a a. permanent committee b. long-term committee c. standing committee d. enduring committee select the best answer from the choices provided

Answers: 1

Answer

Social Studies, 23.06.2019 09:30

Donald was arrested for murdering an acquaintance. at the trial, donald takes the stand and testifies that he and the victim knew each other. he admits that they would drink and use drugs together. one night while partying, donald explains in his testimony, an argument got out of hand during a card game. donald explains that the victim accused him of cheating and pulled out a knife on him and started swinging it in the air. donald said that he had no choice but to pull out his gun and shoot the victim. the jury convicted donald of manslaughter. who would argue that donald weighed the potential costs and benefits of shooting the victim and decided to pull the trigger as a result of free will? a. a rational choice theorist b. a critical criminologist c. a conflict theorist d. a positivist

Answers: 3

Answer

Social Studies, 23.06.2019 12:20

What is the primary difference between jefferson’s and madison’s beliefs about the bill of rights? jefferson believed that a bill of rights was unnecessary, while madison believed that it was necessary. madison believed that it was important to have a bill of rights to protect against the majority. jefferson believed that that the federal system would protect rights without a bill of rights. madison disagreed with jefferson’s belief that a bill of rights would protect citizens.

Answers: 2

Answer

You know the right answer?

From The Salt Lake Tribune, September 13, 2001: "Washington's NATO allies declared Wednesday that th...

Questions