Social Studies, 26.03.2020 00:04 jlozaaaaaa408

The right to privacy is guaranteed by the United States' Bill of Rights.

a. True
b. False

Answers: 2

Show answers

Answers

Answer from: orlandocruz42

a. True

Explanation:

The right to privacy refers to the guarantee of individuals being free from unwarranted searches of their personal belongings which include; home, property, identity etc.

The right to privacy is a legislation that restrains governmental and private organization from carrying out activities that might compromise the privacy of individuals.

Answer from: faithkristi

The answer is option a "True".

Explanation:

There are various items joined together to form a Bill of Rights in the United States by 1791. the Bill of Rights were actually about 12 proposed amendments to the Constitution of the United States by some legislators out of which Amendment two to twelve were ratified into the constitution. The amendments deal with various issues not explicitly stated or ambiguous in the Constitution of the USA. One of the Amendments the Bill of Rights actually add to the Constitution are specifics on the freedom and privacy to secured lives of people in their various homes and belonhonhs.

Answer from: Quest

soothing tone) but quickly, the tone changes from a light tone to a grim one. by introducing disturbing word choices that are illogical.make a list of some of levertov’s images of war from both of her poems. how do her wordsaffect you? do you agree with her position on war? write a short response (at least 100 words) and support your answer with personal experience or your studiespoets can change the tone in a poem, and levertov does when the she refers to "delicate man . .whose eyes/are flowers that perceive the stars”. the word choices here are different. theimages began to show feelings of hope/potential. but this mood is interrupted with the dark oppressive words "entrails of still-alive babies" and "carcass-gulleys". levertov continues to switch tones by "the deep intelligence living at peace would have"—one is left with a sense of hope. i can connect with her words that humans can do better things than fight in war. we only have one life so dying in a war would be for no reason. also, i am a christian and in the bible, it says "thou shall not kill", and i strongly believe in that.people respond differently to satire—some like it, others don't get it. in at least 150 words, describe what you think of goines's narrative essay. discuss whether you think his position is convincing.the satire kept people's attention, rather than just rambling. instead of being dead serious, he adds humor to enlighten it. i think he did a good job of proving his point, but convincing people to stray from their own beliefs is hard, and satire can be offensive to that person. overall i think that goines's narrative essay was good because narrative essay create deeper understanding. i also like that the narrative essay is in first-person. the essay was filled with diction and word choice to let you know that the essay is going to be witty yet satirical. his point was to write

explanation:

Answer from: Quest

Advances in learning and technology made long ocean voyages possible

Another question on Social Studies

Social Studies, 23.06.2019 07:30

Name 2 laws that states can still control today

Answers: 1

Answer

Social Studies, 23.06.2019 09:00

What conclusion can you draw about the connection between religion and feudalism? a. feudalism worked best in christian societies. b. feudalism could not operate in a society that was religious. c. feudalism was not successful in buddhist societies. d. feudalism could operate in societies with different religions.

Answers: 1

Answer

Social Studies, 23.06.2019 09:00

Tori is preparing an informative speech she will be teaching the listeners about complicated concepts and ideas related to genetics she ensures the concept are throughly outlined and provides examples this is most an example of what type of informative speech

Answers: 1

Answer

Social Studies, 23.06.2019 13:30

As bob is driving on an exit off the freeway, he comes to a stop light and sees a homeless man asking people for spare change. “see, he’s a perfect example of why we shouldn’t be giving welfare benefits to the homeless,” bob mutters to his wife. “he’s too lazy to get a job, but he’s healthy enough to beg people for their hard-earned money all day long.” what are the sample and the target in bob’s argument? are there any inductive fallacies present in bob’s reasoning (bias, hastiness, appeal to anecdotal evidence, self-selection)? if so, explain why. if not, explain why not.

Answers: 1

Answer

You know the right answer?

The right to privacy is guaranteed by the United States' Bill of Rights.

a. True
b...

Questions