Vaseem experienced excessive fear while flying because he interpreted his rapid heart rate, shallow breathing, and heavy perspiration as a reaction to the imminent danger of a plane crash. When his psychotherapist convinced him that this physical arousal was simply a harmless reaction to acceleration, cabin pressure, and confined space, his fear of flying was greatly reduced. The reduction in Vaseem's fear is best understood in terms of the: A) James-Lange theory. B) two-factor theory. C) adaptation-level principle. D) relative deprivation principle. E) catharsis hypothesis.

The correct answer is B) two-factor theory.

Explanation:

The two-factor theory also known as Herzberg's motivation-hygiene theory and dual-factor theory states that there are certain factors in the workplace that cause job satisfaction while a separate set of factors cause dissatisfaction, all of which act independently of each other.

These two factors are hygiene factors and motivating factors.

Hygiene factors will cause an employee to work less if not present.

Motivating factors will encourage an employee to work harder if present.

B) two-factor theory

Explanation:

Two-factor theory : It is a theory which suggests that the emotions we feel depend on two things :

It suggests that our psychology and cognitions create emotions.

It also suggests that emotions hasve 2 dactors:

Hence in the given scenario, Vaseem experienced excessive fear while flying because he interpreted his rapid heart rate, shallow breathing, and heavy perspiration as a reaction to the imminent danger of a plane crash. When his psychotherapist convinced him that this physical arousal was simply a harmless reaction to acceleration, cabin pressure, and confined space, his fear of flying was greatly reduced. The reduction in Vaseem's fear is best understood in terms of the two-factor theory.

eat butt i think

explanation:

if interdependence implies a two-way dependence, and if each partner is equally dependent on the other for success, then there is an equal commitment to the making the partnership successful. the advantage is sustainability of the relationship, the disadvantage is that decisions are "democratic" and therefore may take longer to reach and more likely to be a compromise (which is not always the best solution). as the interdependence moves away from equality, the decisions become more influenced by the more independent partner. in the extreme the relationship becomes more dictatorial and more like "master-slave". generally the relationship has less commitment in both directions and is more likely to be temporary.

if one generalizes (and one shouldn't), equity partnerships, which is probably what is implied by interdependence, can be slow to progress or change but durable. the extreme alternative, independent-dependent partnerships tend to be efficient but more fragile.

hope this but you will have to site your own evidence. : )