subject

There were a number of problems with the protocol, but the IRB eventually approved the protocol as a more than minimal risk study at a duly constituted full IRB committee review on February 15, 2010. Accrual and treatment are planned to continue through 2011. Which of the following best describes IRB continuation review requirements for this study? The continuation review can be conducted by the IRB chair only. The IRB may extend the deadline for continuing review by 30 days. After that, the research must cease. The continuation review may be conducted by a voting member of the IRB, delegated by the chair. The research must be re-reviewed by the full IRB committee on or before February 14, 2011.

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 21.06.2019 15:10
•editorial: countries that harm their own citizens cannot be true u.s. allies?
Answers: 3
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 01:30
What is the role of buyer & seller in the marketplace
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 05:00
What was the social class pyramid during the civil war?
Answers: 3
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 10:20
The belmont principle of beneficence requires that: a. subjects derive individual benefit from study participation.b. potential benefits justify the risks of harm.c. the study makes a significant contribution to generalizable knowledge.d. risks are managed so that they are no > minimal.
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
There were a number of problems with the protocol, but the IRB eventually approved the protocol as a...
Questions
question
Social Studies, 27.06.2019 02:00
question
Mathematics, 27.06.2019 02:00
Questions on the website: 13722363