subject
Social Studies, 03.04.2020 19:16 manlycool7543

has been defined as an act of someone "who, believing that the public interest overrides the interest of the organization he serves, publicly blows the whistle if the organization is involved in corrupt, illegal, fraudulent, or harmful activity."

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 07:20
Based on your approved case, create fictitious digital evidence. you may use logs from your own computer (no personal information) as a guide or search the internet for samples. these samples do not have to be technically correct, but there must be a reasonable presumption that this information would exist, supported by a reference. document who, when, and how the evidence was obtained. remember, you are creating fictitious examples, so refer to prior reading or examples of how digital evidence was collected. if necessary, refer to the "who" as a "systems administrator" and ensure the fictitious person is identified and referenced in your investigation. digital evidence must meet each of the following criteria: some of your digital evidence must be retrieved by computer forensics. some of your digital evidence must be retrieved from log files. digital evidence must contain information to support who, what, when, where, and how the cyber-crime was committed. present digital copies of your evidence in text files, screen shots, or pdfs.
Answers: 3
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 09:30
What do these fatwas indicate with regard to the balance between practical legal reasoning and religious dictates answers?
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 22:30
Occurs with the fully informed request of a competant adult patient or their surrogate. culture of life: select the best answer from the choices provided. a. voluntary euthanasia b. nonvoluntary euthanasia c. involuntary euthanasia d. passive euthanasia
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 09:30
The authors of the paper "fudging the numbers: distributing chocolate influences student evaluations of an undergraduate course"† carried out a study to see if events unrelated to an undergraduate course could affect student evaluations. students enrolled in statistics courses taught by the same instructor participated in the study. all students attended the same lectures and one of six discussion sections that met once a week. at the end of the course, the researchers chose three of the discussion sections to be the "chocolate group." students in these three sections were offered chocolate prior to having them fill out course evaluations. students in the other three sections were not offered chocolate. the researchers concluded that "overall, students offered chocolate gave more positive evaluations than students not offered chocolate." indicate whether the study is an observational study or an experiment. give a brief explanation for your choice.
Answers: 3
You know the right answer?
has been defined as an act of someone "who, believing that the public interest overrides the interes...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 29.08.2019 04:30
question
Mathematics, 29.08.2019 04:30
question
Biology, 29.08.2019 04:30
question
Mathematics, 29.08.2019 04:30
Questions on the website: 13722362