U. S. Cattle Industry in the Nineteenth Century
• Wild cattle multiplied for centuries in the Southwest.
• Growing cities created more demand for beef.
• Cowboys rounded up cattle and drove them to shipping centers
on railroad lines
• The introduction of barbed wire and windmills led to large
fenced ranches.

Which statement best completes this list?

F. Congress passed legislation imposing tariffs on imported beef,

G. Most of the cowboys on cattle drives were European immigrants,

H. The cattle industry was nationalized under the Department of Agriculture,

J The need to process large amounts of cattle made meatpacking a major industry,

Ms. h's family is in the waiting room of the intensive care unit. ms. h is very ill and the family has been told she will probably die during this hospital admission. you are walking by the waiting room and you see that they are all seated together, crying. what is your best response? this task contains the radio buttons and checkboxes for options. the shortcut keys to perform this task are a to h and alt+1 to alt+9. a go into the waiting room, sit next to them, and give them time to talk with you. b call the hospital chaplain to visit them and offer prayers. c find a social worker to go into the waiting room to see if they need anything. d leave them alone to give them private time to do their grieving.

How did the kansas-nebraska act contradict the missouri compromise?

Aplaintiff filed a civil action based on negligence against a defendant in federal district court, alleging that the defendant negligently ran a red light at an intersection and collided with the plaintiff's vehicle, causing the plaintiff's injuries. a week after the close of discovery, the plaintiff filed a motion for summary judgment on the issue of whether the defendant was negligent. with the motion, the plaintiff filed (i) his own sworn affidavit, which stated that the traffic signal was green as he entered the intersection, (ii) an affidavit of a witness who was driving the car behind him, which stated that the witness saw the entire incident and that the plaintiff's traffic signal was green as he approached and entered the intersection; and (iii) an affidavit of another witness, which stated that she saw the entire incident and that the defendant's signal had been red for several seconds before the defendant entered the intersection and was still red when the defendant entered the intersection. the defendant filed a response to the motion, noting that her answer denied negligence and further denied that her traffic signal was red, and argued that the issue of negligence and the issue of whether her traffic signal was red were in dispute, so those issues should be tried to a jury. how should the court rule on the plaintiff's motion?