Imagine an officer approaches a group of students for being at a public park after curfew. The officer arrests one teen who was a suspect in a local theft. A judge could throw out the teen's confession unless the officer complies with the ruling in:

A. Gideon v WainwrightB. Mapp v. OhioC. Miranda v. ArizonaD. Roe v. Wade

Miranda vs Arizona

Explanation:

The ruling in Miranda vs Arizona is that detained criminal suspects, prior to police questioning, must be informed of their constitutional right to an attorney and against self-incrimination. If the officer does this, The teen's confession will be used against him.

aren't cheetos good enough to be president?

delete this messag epls it wont let me out this exit