The Supreme Court overturned the Court of Appeals' decision and restored Alvarado's conviction. The Court said that being "in custody" was a matter of law, not of whether Alvarado believed he was in custody. Even though Alvarado was a minor, he was not in custody by law, so he did not have to be reminded of his Miranda rights.

Which answer best describes the Court’s decision?

The confession cannot be used, because Alvarado believed that he could not leave.
The confession can be used, because Alvarado was not in custody.
The confession can be used, because Alvarado thought that he could leave.
The confession cannot be used, because Alvarado did not know his rights

B. The confession can be used, because Alvarado was not in custody.

Explanation:

this statement is true.

forests are public goods, available for everybody. when usage of such a good becomes interesting for consumers and its usage increases, there can be a risk of overexploitation. it is a non rival good therefore, if one person consumes the good it does not reduce the availability for subsequent consumers.

these caracteristics require the establishment of measures in order to prevent the destruction of a commonly owned space, for example, to restrict the amount of people that have access to the same time.

the answer is: c. c.it limited the president’s power to start wars.

the war powers resolution of 1973 requires the president to notify the congress whenever the president wanted to order a military operation to other countries within 48 hours. if after being reviewed the congress disagree with the proposal, that the president will be banned from ordering the operation.