As part of a research to record the effects of sensory deprivation, Aurelia has been locked up in a dark room for four consecutive days. Post the sensory deprivation experiment, which of the following results are most likely to be observed in Aurelia?
A. She is likely to emerge refreshed and energetic.
B. She is likely to experience hallucinations.
C. Her cognitive abilities are likely to increase twofold.
D. She is likely to be able to concentrate better after the experiment

Which of the following was a result of the political debates over the whiskey rebellion?

"it is true that we are called a democracy, for the administration is in the hands of the many and not the few." pericles athenian statesman, 5th century b.c.e. what kind of democracy is pericles referring to? - pericles athenian statesman, 5th century b.c.e. a.representative democracy b.parliamentary democracy c.direct democracy d.presidential democracy

Athief was passing by a house under construction when he noticed that the ladder being used by workers on the roof had copper braces supporting the rungs. after making sure that the workers on the roof could not see him, the thief used pliers that he had in his pocket to remove all of the copper braces that he could reach from the ground. a short time later, a worker climbed down the ladder and it collapsed. he fell to the ground and severely injured his back. the thief was apprehended a few hours later trying to sell the copper for scrap. a statute in the jurisdiction makes it a felony for "maliciously causing serious physical injury to another." the thief was charged with malicious injury under the statute and was also charged with larceny. after a jury trial in which the above facts were presented, he was convicted of both charges. if he appeals the conviction for the malicious injury charge on grounds of insufficient evidence, how should the court rule? a affirm the conviction, because the thief was engaged in criminal conduct at the time of the act that resulted in the injury. b affirm the conviction, because the jury could have found that the thief acted with malice. c reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief intended to injure anyone. d reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief bore any malice towards the workers on the roof.