Social Studies, 14.04.2020 22:29 josebrown521
In this case, the Supreme Court held that the full search of the house was unreasonable, but a search of the arrestee was permitted "to remove any weapons that the [arrestee] might seek to use in order to resist arrest or effect his escape" and to "seize any evidence on the arrestee's person in order to prevent its concealment or destruction."a) Chimel vs. California
b) Rawlings vs. Kentucky
c) Knowles vs. Iowa
d) Sibron vs. New York
Answers: 2
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 02:30
The document shows a personal allowances worksheet. this document is part of a
Answers: 1
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 05:00
Which article of the us constitution addresses the issue of interpeting the laws of the united states
Answers: 1
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 03:00
Me fast do you think the outcome of this case would have been the same if president nixon hadclaimed national security needs rather than executive privilege? why or why not?
Answers: 1
In this case, the Supreme Court held that the full search of the house was unreasonable, but a searc...
Mathematics, 24.09.2021 02:50
Mathematics, 24.09.2021 02:50
Mathematics, 24.09.2021 02:50
Mathematics, 24.09.2021 02:50
History, 24.09.2021 02:50
Spanish, 24.09.2021 02:50
Mathematics, 24.09.2021 02:50
Mathematics, 24.09.2021 02:50
English, 24.09.2021 02:50
Mathematics, 24.09.2021 02:50
Mathematics, 24.09.2021 02:50