Explain how the government responded to social movements through court rulings and policies in the following: Brown v. Board of Education (1954), The Civil Rights Act of 1964 Title IX of the Education Amendments Act of 1972 The Voting Rights Act of 1965 Gerrymandering in relationship to majority-minority redistricting.

The government responded to social movements through court rulings and policies in the following are discussed below.

Explanation:

The Supreme Court opened the door for civil rights reformation through judgments in a series of cases, beginning with Brown v. Board of Education, that invalidated discrimination as a breaking of the equal safeguard clause.

In its judgment, the Supreme Court granted, ordering that “in the area of public learning, separate but equal has no position.” This judgment was a significant achievement for the civil rights movement, and later cases claiming discrimination made on the example set in Brown.

the anti federalists was a movement that was opposed to the creation of a us federal government. although they were not as organized as the federalists, they also had a large group of leaders, especially in state politics.

the statement "now, in a large extended country, it is impossible to have a representation, possessing the sentiments, and of integrity, to declare the minds of the people” represents the concerns of the anti federalists.

they strongly believed that the federalists were representing the interests of aristocratic elements of society at the expense of the majority of ordinary people, who lived in a rural society.

their fear for the creation of a strong federal government and the president’s power of veto in their opinion would create a tyrannical rule that would dominate the people. they defended the importance of restraining the government’s power towards people at any cost.

it all depends on how long the hours are. i think they wouldn't approve of it. in my opinion.