How might media bias have affected the reaction to Fort Sumter in different regions of the country?

For A little bit of context, the attack to Fort Sumter was initiated by the Confederate army in 1861. This basically the first attack that began the American Civil War.

At that time the southern media portrayed the attack as something patriotic. They painted as a heroic war against the federal government that tried to take control over their economy. (at that time, the federal government wanted to free the slaves. This will cause economic damage to the  southern states)

The northern media on the other hand, portrayed the attack as a barbaric behavior. Rather than solving problems with diplomatic action, the southern states were so quick to resort to violence.

This showed a media bias in different regions of the country.

    racial conflict and discrimination has existed ever since man learned to kill with rocks and bones. these conflicts arose from disputes between territory, power, wealth, religion, or simple difference. some of the most infamous racial disputes include slavery, the holocaust, and the civil rights movement.

    these listed disputes often resulted in casualties from all sides. riots, wars, imprisonment, and lynching are all commonly associated with racial conflict on severe levels.

      however, racism is an improving issue in recent decades. people are being more accepting and welcoming of diverse populations. though, the world isn't perfect and it will take much more time, if ever, until the world is rid of racism.

what is the answer