Social Studies, 17.04.2020 15:31 mlbowman3644

is the judicial philosophy that argues the Court should go beyond the words of the Constitution or a statue to consider the broader societal implications of its decisions.
A. Judicial restraint
B. Judicial constraint
C. Judicial appeal
D. Judicial activism

Answers: 2

Show answers

Another question on Social Studies

Social Studies, 21.06.2019 14:00

How can investing in the stock market consumers reach their savings and spending goals?

Answers: 3

Answer

Social Studies, 23.06.2019 01:00

For questions 6-10, match the letter of the description that best matches the term. descriptions: a. to people reach their full potential b. refers to a persons drive to reach his or her full potential c. name the type of therapy developed by rogers d. being accepted by another just as you are, or accepting someone else just as they are e. the bottom of maslows hierarchy 6. need for food, water and oxygen 7. client centered therapy 8. self-actualization 9. the goal of the humanistic approach 10. unconditional positive regard

Answers: 1

Answer

Social Studies, 23.06.2019 02:00

In the case of furman v. georgia (1972), the united states supreme court ruled that the death penalty- in specific cases- being arbitrarily and inconsistently imposed, often in a discriminatory manner. as a result, the imposition of the death penalty as a punishment was stopped throughout the united states.

Answers: 1

Answer

Social Studies, 23.06.2019 16:00

Use your answers to the questions above to write a judicial opinion for each case using this template. explain your answers to each question in detail and use information from the lesson and the court's minority and majority opinions. be sure to check your work for proper spelling and grammar. reflect on your decisions in the cases of hazelwood v. kuhlmeier and t.m. v. state of florida using the following questions: did your opinion reflect the majority or minority opinion on each case? did you tend to favor loose or strict interpretation of the laws and rights for each case? what factors most influenced your decision and interpretations in each case? use your answers to the questions above to write a judicial opinion for each case using this template. explain your answers to each question in detail and use information from the lesson and the court's minority and majority opinions. be sure to check your work for proper spelling and grammar.

Answers: 1

Answer

You know the right answer?

is the judicial philosophy that argues the Court should go beyond the words of the Constitution or a...

Questions