Living in Louisiana her entire life, Kira moved to Atlanta, Georgia, after her
eighteenth birthday. She kept her Louisiana driver's license and had her mail
sent to her parents' address in Louisiana. She found a job as a cook at a
restaurant and worked there for three years. During her second year in Atlanta,
Kira volunteered for the mayoral campaign of a Democratic candidate. On
election day, she was turned away from a polling location and was unable to cast
her ballot for Atlanta's mayor.
Which statement BEST
explains whether Kira should have been allowed to vote?
A She should not have been allowed to vote because she volunteered for a mayoral campaign.
B. She should have been allowed to vote because she was employed in Atlanta.
C. She should have been allowed to vote because she was over eighteen years old.
D. She should not have been allowed to vote because she was not a legal resident of Georgia.

Which of the following will increase a population's growth rate? read the following scenario and answer the question(s) below. population growth is at the root of many serious environmental problems. from the ancient babylonians thousands of years ago, to thomas malthus two centuries ago, to present day neo-malthusians, humans seem to possess an awareness of earth's limitations in the face of growing populations. today, our ability to accurately quantify and monitor population growth is very sophisticated. we can measure growth and make predictions about world growth with mathematical and computer models. despite long-lasting, rapid global population growth that is only recently starting to show signs of slowing, we have thus far been able to avoid global catastrophe. can we continue to avoid disaster? which of the following will increase a population's growth rate? increased urbanization increased industrialization increased immigration decreased immigration increased emigratio

Supreme court. jim, who is a bit eccentric, says that he is fed up with the way a certain employer in his town treats employees and that he is going to sue that employer in an effort to improve matters. jim also says that he is going to start his case at the appellate court level, skipping over all those "lesser" judges. jim says that those justices will surely hear him out and that he will also seek a jury. although he is not a lawyer, jim believes that the offenses of the employer are so severe that the justices will appreciate his attempt to make things better for the employees involved. will jim get a jury at the appellate court level?

Who is responsible for maintaining a balanced state budget