Charlie writes a will leaving all of his belongings to his wife. After Charlie's wife dies, his daughter, Marie, invites Charlie to come live with her. Charlie has his lawyer draw up a new will leaving everything to Marie, except for $1 which he left to his son Stephen "who never visits me." Shortly after, Marie goes with Charlie to his lawyer's office, where Marie and Charlie's lawyer witness Charlie sign the will. Charlie's daughter never read the new will and is shocked when she learns of her inheritance after her father's death. Stephen, however, is outraged. What is Stephen's best argument against the new will?

Stephen's best defence is that Charlie is mentally unstable.

Explanation:

Stephen's best defense is that his father made the new will after suffering great grief from his wife's death and was mentally unstable as of the time he wrote the new will.

He can argue that his father had a previous will where he left everything to his wife and after her death, coupled with the grief, he went to live with his daughter Marie. Living with Marie made Charlie believe he was with his wife because he had someone taking care of him like his dead wife so in his mental instability, he wrote a new will and left everything to Marie, his daughter who was taking care of him.

Stephen can also argue that he loves his father and his claims that he doesn't visit him is false because after his wife's death, he became schizophrenic and couldn't recall events accurately. He can make moves to have his new will rendered obsolete because Charlie was not mentally stable as of the time of making the new will

well, i can't read it so i'll ask you questions about it : )

if you were a reader and you read the introduction, would you want to read more?

does it start with a question? if so, is it something you would want to read about?

and ask any friends or family for their opinion : )