subject
Social Studies, 06.05.2020 02:14 cutboymon

Use the passage below to answer the following question. "The mystique of inside information—"if you only knew what we know"—was a most effective way to defend the national-security monopoly and prevent democratic control of foreign policy . . . "The power to leak meant the power to tell the people what it served the government’s purpose that they should know . . . "The power to withhold and the power to leak led on inexorably to the power to lie. The secrecy system instilled in the executive branch the idea that foreign policy was no one’s business save its own, and the uncontrolled secrecy made it easy for lying to become routine." -Arthur Schlesinger, The Imperial Presidency, 1973 Based on the text, which of the following statements would the author most likely agree with?

a. the obama administration’s 2016 decision not to enforce immigration laws mandating the deportation of undocumented young people
b. the gulf of tonkin resolution of 1964, which authorized the president to do whatever was necessary to aid us allies in southeast asia
c. the war powers resolution of 1973, which aimed to give congress more say in whether us troops were deployed abroad
d. the patriot act of 2001, which expanded government surveillance measures in order to combat terrorism

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 21.06.2019 22:30
In what two ways were the tang and song dynasties of china similar? they jointly built the grand canal. they were economically strong. they had weak military forces. they ruled for about 300 years. they discouraged buddhist ideas.
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 12:00
Does (flavius) josephus believe the romans were merciful when they conquered people? how does he try to persuade the reader to support his belief?
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 01:30
Thomas jefferson was alarmed by the fierce debate over warning americans about its threat to national unity. 1.) slavery 2.) the powers of congress 3.) the missouri compromise 4.) escaped slaves
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 01:50
Research and review one of the following cases: 1. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc. 2. young vs ups 3. vance vs ball state university after you have thought through and understand the case answer the following: 1. explain the facts of the case leading to the dispute. 2. define and show understanding of each of the terms assigned to your case. break the laws into components where necessary. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) disparate treatment discrimination, 4)disparate impact discrimination vance vs ball state university: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) hostile work environment, 4) a supervisor for title vii purposes young vs ups: 1) title vii, 2) pregnancy discrimination act, 3)american's with disabilities act, 4) reasonable accommodation 3.how do the above concepts come into play in the case? 4. what rule of law came from the case? what did the court decide? 5. based on your understanding of employment law was the ruling correct? explain using a legal principle.
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
Use the passage below to answer the following question. "The mystique of inside information—"if you...
Questions
question
Social Studies, 04.11.2021 14:40
question
History, 04.11.2021 14:40
question
English, 04.11.2021 14:40
question
History, 04.11.2021 14:40
question
Mathematics, 04.11.2021 14:50
question
History, 04.11.2021 14:50
question
Mathematics, 04.11.2021 14:50
Questions on the website: 13722360