In a loose constructionist perspective, how is the constitution viewed?
a) the constitution can be interpreted but cannot be changed in order to grow.
b) the constitution is to be used just as written and cannot be changed.
c) the constitution is to be used just as written but can be changed.
d) the constitution is up to interpreting and can be changed in order to grow.

D) The constitution is up to interpreting and can be changed in order to grow.

Explanation:

Constructionism is the learning theory that states that people learn better by constructing something tangible, and that it is to trial and error that we can solve better our problems, so if you take this as a perspective a constructionist would say that the constitution should be up for interpretation and that we would need to change it, in a trial and error basis, to grow.

the invasive species was introduced due to commercial purpouses, as there was a demand for fur clothes and hence, a business opportunity connected to this product. actually, it was when the nutrias scaped, causing harm to the us ecosystems when they acquired the status of invasive species. in this case they have caused an environmental problem, but it could have affected also economic interests or even human health.

imagine me knowing the answer