Because everyone knows that a persuasive speaker’s goal is to influence the audience’s beliefs or actions, questions of ethics are less important in persuasive speaking than in other kinds of speaking. True False

False                                                            

Explanation:

Persuasive speech: The term "persuasive speech" is described as a particular type of speech whereby speaker has a specific goal of convincing his or her audience in order to accept his or her viewpoint or whatever he or she says. Therefore, the speech is being arranged in a way to cause the audience to accept all viewpoint or expressed view. A persuasive speaker generally starts his or her speech or presentation with an emotional punch.

In the question above, the given statement is "false".

the answer is the petition of right.

explanation:

offer to of right, real demand of attesting a benefit against the english crown, the most remarkable point of reference being the petition of right of 1628, which parliament sent to charles i fussing of a movement of oversteps of law. the term also implied the framework (invalidated in 1947) by which a subject could sue the crown.   taking a gander at the frameworks used by maria amidu to make a standard in 2015 commending the 1628 petition of right, which was sent to charles i by the english parliament. at uniquely based law the crown, or the sovereign in his official cutoff, couldn't be sued in the ruler's courts. since the ruler was, really, the superior ace of those courts, coordinating value in them between his subjects, he was not subject to their ward. therefore it transformed into a preparation, at whatever point a subject's certified or individual property had come into the responsibility for ruler or his specialists without legitimate perfect, for the subject to engage the master in chamber for its recovery.

are there any options?