Performance Task:
After reading both speeches by Harriet Tubman and Emma Watson,
explore...
Social Studies, 06.05.2020 19:10 powellkolbie
Performance Task:
After reading both speeches by Harriet Tubman and Emma Watson,
explore why Sojourner Truth think it would be beneficial for men to
allow others the same rights that they enjoy. Write an essay
explaining how Sojourner's point of view compares to Emma
Watson's depiction of how men and boys are diadvantaged by
gender inequality.
HTML Editora
T
=
=
=
=
=
Answers: 1
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 07:00
Which two characteristics belong to mahayana buddhism. a.followers worship and offer animal sacrifice at festivals b.a followers highest aim is to attain the status of a bodhisattva c.an emphasis is placed on fulfilling sensual pleasure d.this form of buddhism is the most acient for od buddhism that exists today e.followers belive that everyone is capable of attaining enlightenment
Answers: 3
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 17:00
What effect did increased automobile production have on other industries
Answers: 3
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 06:00
Ahusband who believed that his wife was having an affair with his brother hired an arsonist to burn down the brother's house. they planned for the husband to take his brother to a ballgame so that the arsonist would be able to set the house on fire without detection. after the husband and brother left for the ballgame, however, the arsonist decided to abandon the plan and immediately left town without doing anything further. when the husband returned from the ballgame with the brother, he saw the house still standing and blurted out what was supposed to have happened. the husband and the arsonist were arrested and charged with conspiracy to commit arson. at the arsonist's trial, his attorney argued that he was innocent of the conspiracy because he decided not to go ahead with the plan, and nothing criminal had in fact occurred.at common law, how should a jury find the arsonist? a not guilty of conspiracy, because going to a ballgame is not a criminal overt act.b not guilty of conspiracy, because the husband, not the arsonist, committed the overt act.c guilty, because the husband executed his part of the plan.d guilty, because the arsonist agreed to set the brother's house on fire.
Answers: 2
Mathematics, 26.09.2019 01:40
Social Studies, 26.09.2019 01:40
Mathematics, 26.09.2019 01:40
Mathematics, 26.09.2019 01:40
English, 26.09.2019 01:40
Mathematics, 26.09.2019 01:40