Social Studies, 07.05.2020 01:03 dathanboyd

4) What policy did Necker recommend to Louis XVI?

Answers: 3

Show answers

Another question on Social Studies

Social Studies, 21.06.2019 20:30

Scenario: the economy of country y has been in an economic downturn for the last several months. recently, businesses have invested in new technologies in order to produce the goods that consumers are demanding within the nation's own borders. the government has removed regulations to allow producers and consumers to have more financial freedom. as a result, consumer spending has increased and the economy has begun to improve. use the drop-down menus to complete the sentences. according to the information presented about country y, the classical economic concept of ( the invisible hand, consumer efficiency, government regulations) can be seen. the economic events of country y demonstrate the idea of laissez faire because the government (did, did not) intervene in economic events.

Answers: 1

Answer

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 01:00

What is one main reason some governments in the twentieth century began campaigns of genocide? a) a minority group wanted total independence. b) a minority group wanted more say in lawmaking. c) a minority group had different cultural customs. d)a minority group protested against government policy.

Answers: 2

Answer

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 10:20

Functionalism was a school of psychology that focused attention on the

Answers: 1

Answer

Social Studies, 23.06.2019 00:50

Sara and her friends were at an iowa football game in iowa city. sara is a life long resident of iowa and goes to college at dmacc. while she was in iowa city, robert smashed into her car when he ran a red light. sara was seriously injured and taken to university hospitals in iowa city (fortunately her injuries were not life threatening but laid her up for a long time and she had to drop out of college for the rest of the semester). robert is from michigan and was in iowa city to see the game and then to party later. at the time of the accident robert was drunk (at least legally - he blew a 0.17 and the limit is 0.08). sara has sustained about $500,000 in damages between her current and future medical bills, pain/suffering, lost wages, etc. also her car was totaled in the accident. can sara sue robert in a federal court? explain why or why not. (be sure to mention the two primary factors associated with suing someone in a federal court in a case like this.)