In the first column of the second page, several men attempt to stage a revolt against the Nazis, but a number of the older men beg their children not to do anything. Why do you think they do this? Do you think it was wise for their children to listen?

The older men were being cautious

Explanation:

The men became overwhelmed by the happenings around them and could barely bare them again, so in an attempt to overcome them they planned out a revolt which will lead to the beginning of their freedom. The older men were afraid and being cautious of their children endangering themselves in the revolt hence they told them not to do anything.

Although its wise for the children to follow their parents instruction but the men need the aid of  everyone to carry out this and the greater percentage of those that would have made it more meaningful were the children being warned.

if interdependence implies a two-way dependence, and if each partner is equally dependent on the other for success, then there is an equal commitment to the making the partnership successful. the advantage is sustainability of the relationship, the disadvantage is that decisions are "democratic" and therefore may take longer to reach and more likely to be a compromise (which is not always the best solution). as the interdependence moves away from equality, the decisions become more influenced by the more independent partner. in the extreme the relationship becomes more dictatorial and more like "master-slave". generally the relationship has less commitment in both directions and is more likely to be temporary.

if one generalizes (and one shouldn't), equity partnerships, which is probably what is implied by interdependence, can be slow to progress or change but durable. the extreme alternative, independent-dependent partnerships tend to be efficient but more fragile.

hope this but you will have to site your own evidence. : )

fast - juice wrld