What do you think the U. S. and NATO should do with regards to Afghanistan and Pakistan? Make sure to include why. 5-6 sentences. (The Taliban and the US invasion of Afghanistan)

India and Pakistan have highly disparate goals for Afghanistan, and they thus undertake very

different activities there. Delhi has striven to bolster the government in Kabul and integrate

Afghanistan into wider regional political and economic structures. This has not been done out

of any sense of altruism. By strengthening Afghanistan, India advances its own national security objectives—namely, eliminating a critical safe haven for terrorists who have attacked India

and continue plotting to do so in the future, projecting power throughout South Asia (and

beyond), and gaining access to Central Asian trade and energy resources. Although Delhi’s

goals for Afghanistan certainly involve minimizing Islamabad’s influence there, the government’s overall policy is geared primarily to advancing India’s broader domestic and regional

interests independently of its rivalry with Pakistan.

In contrast, Pakistan’s goals for Afghanistan are mainly—although not exclusively—

India-centric and focus primarily on undermining Delhi’s influence in Afghanistan. Islamabad

seeks a weak Kabul government dominated by a pliant, supportive Taliban so that Pakistan can

maintain “strategic depth” against an Indian invasion, guarantee safe haven for Islamist proxies that it supports, prevent Delhi from projecting power in South Asia, and obstruct India’s

ability to support separatists in the Pakistani province of Balochistan. In Islamabad’s Afghanistan calculus, protecting itself against Indian encroachment takes precedence over pursuing

Pakistan’s broader geopolitical and economic goals. Part of the reason for this strategic orientation is the preeminent decisionmaking role played by Pakistan’s military, which emphasizes

security matters over virtually all other elements of foreign policy. So long as India is viewed as

an existential threat, and so long as the military plays a central role in setting Pakistani policy,

it is unlikely that there will be a fundamental shift in this policy bias.1

With its military-dominated decisionmaking apparatus focused on internal security concerns and on keeping other powers from exerting influence in Afghanistan, Pakistan has little

of positive value to offer Afghanistan or other countries in the region. Pakistan is not positioned well to boost trade, and it has demonstrated little willingness to take steps designed to

improve the lives of ordinary Afghans. By contrast, India’s democratic polity, institutionalized decisionmaking processes, relative internal stability, apolitical military, large consumer

base, and growing economy make it a far more palatable partner for Kabul. Thus, although

Hamid Karzai’s government has clearly been prepared to play India and Pakistan against one

another—often effectively—it has also taken explicit steps to distance itself from Islamabad

while embracing Delhi’s cooperation and assist

the arab empire adopted the muslim religion as their main belief. arabs would influence the people from the territories they invaded towards islam (the muslim belief).

nevertheless, throughout the history of the arab empire, rulers brought intellectual individuals from other religions to their centers of learning. these other foreigners included jews, christians, greeks, persians, and indians.   these resulted in the adoption of important knowledge developed by these cultures by the arabic empire. for example, the works of aristotle were translated from greek to arab and indian scientists brought the numerical concept of "zero" to the arabs.

nowadays, 93% of the arab population is muslim, which at the same time is subdivided in sects including the sunni, zaini, alawi, shia. the remaining 7% is composed mainly of christians.

its d i know cause i've been googling it