When it comes to forensic science, which statement would be an example of modernist thinking? The suspect's DNA seems to match the sample picked up at the crime scene but since technology is always changing, it might not really be a match.

Yes, the suspect's footprints were found at the scene of the crime, but the suspect lives close and might have walked there another time.

The gun has been fired 17 times and all 17 bullets match the bullet in the victim, so that proves it is the murder weapon.

The fingerprint found at the scene may appear to be a match, but there is no guarantee that this is the correct suspect.

I find modernism a little confusing so plz answer :)