The 70-year-old Siddika Khatun has all the interest to talk about the old days, but the children do not have the time to listen. She is not even asked her opinion during the marriage ceremony of her granddaughter. Jobeda Begum, their neighbour tells the children of Siddika Khatun that they should take care of food and health of their mother. She also advises them to take her to different places sometimes. Questions:-
A. What kind of problem is faced by Siddika Khatun? Explain.
B. Do you think Jobeda Begum’s advice about Siddika Khatun is correct? State reasons for your answer.

so feel siddika is face with the problem if reminiscing the past and trying to pass morals to young persons without euthsiasim and interest.

Explanation:

soothing tone) but quickly, the tone changes from a light tone to a grim one. by introducing disturbing word choices that are illogical.make a list of some of levertov’s images of war from both of her poems. how do her wordsaffect you? do you agree with her position on war? write a short response (at least 100 words) and support your answer with personal experience or your studiespoets can change the tone in a poem, and levertov does when the she refers to "delicate man . .whose eyes/are flowers that perceive the stars”. the word choices here are different. theimages began to show feelings of hope/potential. but this mood is interrupted with the dark oppressive words "entrails of still-alive babies" and "carcass-gulleys". levertov continues to switch tones by "the deep intelligence living at peace would have"—one is left with a sense of hope. i can connect with her words that humans can do better things than fight in war. we only have one life so dying in a war would be for no reason. also, i am a christian and in the bible, it says "thou shall not kill", and i strongly believe in that.people respond differently to satire—some like it, others don't get it. in at least 150 words, describe what you think of goines's narrative essay. discuss whether you think his position is convincing.the satire kept people's attention, rather than just rambling. instead of being dead serious, he adds humor to enlighten it. i think he did a good job of proving his point, but convincing people to stray from their own beliefs is hard, and satire can be offensive to that person. overall i think that goines's narrative essay was good because narrative essay create deeper understanding. i also like that the narrative essay is in first-person. the essay was filled with diction and word choice to let you know that the essay is going to be witty yet satirical. his point was to write  

explanation:

most cajuns resided in acadiana, where their descendants are still predominant